Chris Mathews says nothing justifies the existance of Republicans

Last week MSNBC was fun to watch. It was the start of the Benghazi hearings and everyone was holding their breath, some in MSNBC might have even turned blue.  So the saga began on Wednesday May 8, 2013 with the network reporting that there was no "hard evidence" in the Benghazi hearings, regardless of the all the testimonies, and the fact that "someone" said "stand down". The mystery someone that MSNBC will never investigate of course.  

Chris Hayes said desperately "Republican official and Conservative pundits were sure today’s Benghazi hearing would be bigger than Watergate, bigger than Iran-Contra…but a funny thing happened on the way to the witch hunt, the chickens of cable news came home to roust ."

Of course he didn't make mention of Clinton's Impeachment, God forbid a comparison while Obama faces the same. I also love the way these weak liberals don't get fired for being bullies and for their abusive language and their exaggerations that are libelous. But who was it? Rick Sanchez who called Jon Stewart a bigot and got fired? Liberals just ooze of weakness.

Hayes went on to say "that the Republicans were knocked off today by forces of "DIRT" greater than them. So of course Hayes called half of America dirt! He truly is a disgusting human being. This network is going to make all Democrats look like "BIGGOTS." Oh my goodness did I say that?

Then Chris Mathews gives an incredible long speech, where if you put it together he really wants all Republicans dead.

 "The Republican Party once believed in certain principals, balanced budget, law and order, strong defense, today, it believes in the main chance that’s out there, prying the horizons for the opportunity of instant success. Where they can exploit the hell out of something and somehow end up on top. Benghazi Benghazi …. It’s what will transform a party of weak Presidents' candidacy, and frozen in place politics and congressional obstruction. For as long as the eye can see, they like a national candidate that can woo the vital American center and still meet the harsh dictates of its political base, nor can it find the policy that will grab the country’s imagination.  What they have in their sites what they savor with mouthwatering anticipation is, let’s call it what it is, what they are drooling to devour, is dirt. They are hoping if they can keep making charges, keep digging, keep promising more, one find day they’ll find   something in the desert sands of Libya to justify their existence.

Oops Chris a "weak" presidential candidate ?? weak, with Obama on your team? 
Oops Chris, "congressional obstruction", it looks like it's the State Department that's the obstructer, but you don't know that yet on that day did you?
Oops Chris " a policy to capture" well your team did use an "analysis team" to get your vote... and
Oops Chris.... "justify their existence" I don't think they're going anywhere.

It was sad to see Mathews practically cry "Does this thing have an end?"  No sorry Mathews it isn't going to end any time soon, and you're doing horribly in your rating, actually you admitted last week that "all" of you guys stay "glued" to Fox News. Now what stupid group of Network personnel admits they get their "news" from their competing network? Maybe if MSNBC hired professionals it wouldn't have to go to other sources for real facts. 

Gun Control, Gun Control and more Gun Control !

Last week MSNBC decided to cover the gun control controversy, and cover it, and cover it, and cover it. It was quite ridiculous, and I decided to sum up the end of last week in weeknight tv on MSNBC as being about “gun c control”.  Did they report on much else? Yes, somehow on the Rachel’s Mad Show, she decided to cover the closing an abortion clinic. Did she show what an abortion means, maybe a picture of the final product? No, of course not, no station shows that, they say it’s too graphic. It’s too graphic because it should be outlawed. When you fight for something you can’t even look at you have major moral issues, and Ms. Maddow, definitely has deep emotional issues in her life, it’s obvious by her inability to tell the truth and with every angry word she utters that she calls news.

Last week Al Shartpon mentions the word “Republican, GOP, or “extreme right winged” (and yes, I counted) 38 times in his one hour show. Not only is MSNBC chronically bring up past Republican presidents in an effort to blame them for everything, but they also can’t seem to let go of the word. Don’t they know that can be hypnotic, and they can be doing themselves more harm than good?

I decided also to start providing a list of MSNBC SPONSORS that buy commercial space on their night time shows, in a hopes to boycott any company doing business with a manipulative and fact falsifying station.

·         CHECKERS

·         ANGIES’S LIST

·         ALLSTATE

·         ENERGYTOMMORROW.ORG

·         EXPEDIA

·         WELLS FARGO BANK

·         BOSTON MARKET

·         V-8

·         BEALS

·         CIALIS

·         UVERSE

·         LEGAL ZOOM

·         GE

·         AMERITRADE

Alex Wagner’s sat in on the news for Lawrence O’Donnell and explained that 47% of Americans do not pay Federal Income Tax because they are the elderly that have illness or students, and that the Republican party is trying to starve them out. I don’t think Alex knows how to do math. How are 53% of the public supposed to work to support 47% of their society unless they work (TWICE AS HARD TO PAY FOR TWO?) One of the reason’s there are so many “elderly’ needing government help is that we “can’t afford to support people from the age of 65 to 95, with the new life expectancies. WE can’t! We don’t have the money!  Either we up the age of retirement or we fall further economically. That’s just a fact. 

THEN, she shows a map showing the states that have the most people that pay the least in federal taxes, and she continues to say they are “Republican” states. I couldn't find the original picture on their site (not unusual) so I had to recreate it as best as I could, here is what it looked like.  >

Don’t you think it’s KIND OF WEIRD, that these states boarder Mexico? I can’t believe she proved the Republican point. We need to close our borders!

The Rachel's Mad Show

MSNBC seems to do such little journalism work that they tend to replay themes, replay Jon Stewart clips, and replay the same videos in “every” show they have at night. On MSNBC tonight the theme seemed to have been dedicated to former Republican presidents and everything bad they could pull from the past. The covered the Richard Nixon Watergate scandal. Really? That’s current news? Let’s analyze Rachel Maddow’s ramble about the Iran-Contra situation during the Reagan administration. 

I love the way MSNBC explains a story, leaving out the most important facts and reasons. Maddow tries to quickly explain the situation in Iran at that time over 30 years ago! She explains it as a very bad situation, that's all. She rambled through very quickly, saying our relations with Iran were bad, and complicated. Then lies and explains we were helping Iran for political reasons. Wrong!  Of course incomplete journalism and reporting; this is to be expected from them. Their rating are paying for their lack of journalism integrity. I had to laugh because Fox news announced having reached 3 million in Facebook fans. I decided to look at MSNBC’s Facebook page and they has only 155,000 likes, even with all their brain washing attempts, their obnoxious anchor commercials, they still can’t get audience numbers. The REAL sad part was that their night time show Lock up has 187,000 likes.  They are keeping that station alive with reality show convicts. Why am I not surprised?

Nonetheless, let’s continue with Rachel. First let me explain that in Iran, President Reagan was trying to negotiate the return of 7 American hostages being held in Iran, and the real reason for the exchange, now maybe to Rachel this wasn't important, but for many Americans it was. Yes, war equipment was being sold, and not to Iran, it was done through Israel. Given that in this deal they were able to obtain capital, they felt the money would be “best” used to fight the Contra rebels in Nicaraguan who were committing outrages crimes.  

If Ms. Maddow would take to the time to at least “Wiki”, she would find this: “The Contras' form of warfare was "one of consistent and bloody abuse of human rights, of murder, torture, mutilation, rape, arson, destruction and kidnapping". The "Contras systematically engageinviolent abuses...so prevalent that these may be said to be their principal means of
waging war". A Human Right Watch report found that the Contras were guilty of targeting health care clinics and health care workers for assassination; kidnapping civilians; torturing and executing civilians, including children, who were captured in combat; raping women; indiscriminately attacking civilians and civilian homes; seizing civilian property; and burning civilian houses in captured towns”

Not only were the Contras committing these crimes against innocent victims with ongoing casuralties, but this is no different than the vicious crimes being inflicted on civilians today in Syria. Another element in the conflict in Nicaragura was the issue of Communism. The Contras were not only trying to take over the country with violent and horrendous acts, but they also wanted to instill a totalitarian and restrictive Communist regime, having no respect for human rights, and all that “I thought” the liberals held so dear to their heart. The U.S. Congress later resumed aid to the Contras, totaling over $300 million!

But Ms. Maddows can’t seem to tell a complete story, she doesn't seem to be big on the “total” truth.  She can’t even “wiki” like a 3^rd grader. Reagan was never indicted or found guilty of any crime. The station loves to make comparisons, like with Clinton, although MSNBC and their very opinionated hosts would like you to believe that he was impeached for having an affair, viewers need to know he was impeached for A FELONY CHARGE OF PERJURY. I advise the MSNBC watcher to take a minute or two of their day to at least Google MSNBC's “half” stories, I mean research – something - anything - please?

Poor Rachel, then her show was followed by an interview with Carol Rosenberg, where she is informed that things have really - really - really gotten worse in Guantanamo Base since Obama had been in office, and even worse in recent weeks. She described how the prisoners are shackled (can you imagine that, being shackled in prison). The ironic part, and most amusing one to anyone with a brain, is the fact that MSNBC shows people in shackles almost every night in their #1 RATED SHOW! – LOCK UP. 

Rachel tried hard to steer the interview towards the advantage of the Obama Administration, but it wasn't working. She tried to get Rosenber to blame the reasons behind the present Guantanamo base disruptions on the loss of prisoner hope for release.  She made sure these were the final thoughts in the interview regardless of the fact she was trying to spoon fed the response.  I mean are these people for real?  The great part was Rachel’s reaction to this information is that she was calm, too calm. I think maybe in shock. How was she going to defend President Obama with this story? She had just explained in the beginning of her show that our government now under Obama is so different. She just thanked the lady and bowed out. Too Classic!